jump to navigation

More on building an online media company to $50m in revenues March 14, 2007

Posted by jeremyliew in advertising, Consumer internet, Internet, Lead gen, start-up, startups, VC, Venture Capital, web 2.0.
trackback

As my previous post indicated, it is not easy to build an online media company to $50m in revenue. Depending on whether you’re broad reach, demographically focused, or can support endemic advertisers, you need to get to top 10, top 25 or top 125 levels of US website traffic.

A couple of interesting studies have come out recently that underscore how difficult this can be.

At the Online Publishers Association’s Forum on the Future earlier this month, Marketspace (a consulting firm associated with Monitor) announced the results of their research which showed that 92% of 2006 gross online ad spend in the US went to only four companies; Google, Yahoo, MSN and AOL. Although some portion of that ad spend was subsequently distributed to independent sites through ad networks (e.g. AOL’s Advertising.com, Google’s Adsense, Yahoo’s Publisher Network etc), that is a big proportion of the total. Furthermore, that is an INCREASE from the 88% that went to those four companies in 2005.

Now According to the IAB and PwC, internet advertising revenues for 2006 were estimated to be $16.8 billion, a 34 percent increase over $12.5 billion in 2005. So doing the math, that suggests that the online advertising that didn’t go to the big four actually DECREASED from $1.5bn in 2005 to $1.34bn in 2006.

For companies in the broad reach/$1 RPM bucket, this probably doesn’t matter much. Ad networks owned by the big four sell a lot of their advertising anyway. But for companies that target endemic advertisers, this is sobering information. To be able to realize RPMs in the $20 range, companies will need to have their own sales force. And if these numbers are to be believed, this sales force is actually competing for a share of a slightly shrinking pie.

These numbers don’t quite match to the numbers in Avenue A/Razorfish’s 2007 Digital Outlook report, which is well summarized at Paidcontent, but they agree directionally. Avenue A says that portals have increased their share of online ad spend by 85% from 2005 to 2006, from 13% of overall ad spend to 24%. (This report breaks out search and ad networks separately – the big four would be a combination of these categories).

It would appear that advertisers are seeking consolidation in their spending patterns.

This isn’t entirely a doom and gloom story – online advertising revenue as a class is still growing at 34%, and $1.34bn of online ad spend among the independents is still plenty of revenue to go around. But it does underscore the need for websites to have a compelling story for advertisers, both about user targeting and about volume of traffic.

Comments»

1. Moving Company » More on building an online media company to $50m in revenues - March 14, 2007

[…] post by jeremyliew and powered by Img […]

2. Three ways to build an online media business to $50m in revenue « Lightspeed Venture Partners Blog - March 14, 2007

[…] UPDATE III: I’ve posted more on the difficulties in building a media business to $50m in revenues here. […]

3. joe - March 14, 2007

Its somewhat ironic… long tail of advertisers is serving the largest publishers. Meanwhile, the long tail of demographic and vertical publishers need a business development staff in house to pursue a shrinking pie of premium advertisers.

4. Eytan - March 16, 2007

Hi Jeremey,
Great post! This definitely is an interesting break down of where ad dollars are being spent.

I think, however, that what makes this so incredibly misleading is something which you call out and that is “…Although some portion of that ad spend was subsequently distributed to independent sites through ad networks (e.g. AOL’s Advertising.com, Google’s Adsense, Yahoo’s Publisher Network etc)…”

This is not a small deal. So many sites use these Ad Networks and many of them are non-trivial. A simple example if Engadget. That is a huge site which uses AdSense. I dont think this is an isolated example. It is easy to say that the ad dollars are being spent with Google, however that feels too simplistic because the reality of it is that much of that money is getting plowed to sites such as engadget.

eytan

5. jeremyliew - March 16, 2007

Eytan,

I agree, the money flowing to smaller sites is not a small deal. According to Google’s latest quarterly filing, their TAC is about 30% of their total revenue, $825m in Q4 2006 alone. (TAC is the amount they pay their network of partners). This includes both search and adsense revenue share, with search being the lion’s share of the TAC payments. But taking this into account, I think you come to similar conclusions directionally (although the numbers change).

Note too that TAC % is lower for AOL, MS and Y! than it is for Google as Google has the biggest network of partners.

6. Eytan - March 17, 2007

Hi Jeremy,
First off, I apologize for misspelling your name! Second, thanks for the reply!

I pulled the TAC numbers from Google: http://investor.google.com/earnings.html and found that Google had TAC of 723M, 785M, 825M and 976M in Q1 through Q4 respectively. This totals 3,309M.

It is harder to find the numbers on Yahoo! In one particular quarter in 2005 it looks like they paid out about 353M in TAC: http://docs.yahoo.com/docs/pr/pdf/1q05pr.pdf

MS and AOL don’t break out TAC numbers.

So, let’s say that Yahoo!, MS and AOL combined had a total TAC of 1,700M in 2006. This does not seem absurd given that Yahoo! had about 353M of it one quarter, in 2005.

That is a total of 5,000M (5B) or 30% of the 16.8B spent on advertising in 2006. Combined with the other 8% and the equation is now that 62% goes to Google, Yahoo, AOL and Microsoft and that the other 38% goes to *many* other businesses. I agree that the big 4 are still taking in the majority of dollars, however, it is not nearly as dramatic as 92%.

At the core, however, your observation is an interesting one.

eytan

7. The Journal Blog - March 19, 2007

I guess ‘value’ depends on the kind of investment you want to make

8. Jay Patterson - March 20, 2007

a lot of great info on this post.

Jay Patterson
Overland Park, Kansas

9. ben - March 20, 2007

For anyone interested in financial analysis on monetizing web traffic I’d suggest having a look at Morgan Stanley’s site as well where their research folks post some interesting presentations on the topic:

http://www.morganstanley.com/views/perspectives/files/Global_Internet_Trends_121906_FINAL.pdf

http://www.morganstanley.com/institutional/techresearch/pdfs/msinternetadreport101306.pdf

They estimate that Y! + Google take 58% of US online ad spend, So while I don’t think the number gets to 92% for the top four it looks like it could realistically be better than 62%. I think AOL’s revenue from their SEC filings was $1.8B, so give them another 10% and maybe 5-10% for MS. The key driver IMO is search and the ad networks. Search is 44% of total market spend, and that’s all but locked up by top players, and the handful of leading ad networks probably make up another 5-10% (ad.com alone had $455 M which would be 2.5%) which is directly competing for premium display money even before you take into account the YouTubes of the world.

10. online » More on building an online media company to $50m in revenues - April 1, 2007

[…] Original post by jeremyliew […]

11. Derek Powazek – links for 2007-05-23 - May 23, 2007

[…] More on building an online media company to $50m in revenues Stunning post from back in March I just found. Good news / bad news for online publishers. (tags: advertising business economics) […]

12. Three ways to build an online media business to $50m in revenue « Telling it as it is - June 1, 2007

[…] UPDATE III: I’ve posted more on the difficulties in building a media business to $50m in revenues here. […]

13. Brian Feinstein » My take on online media. - December 14, 2008

[…] high hopes, nearly 90% of advertising dollars are going to the big 4 publishers. As Jeremy Liew points out, 92% of 2006 online ad spend went to Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, and AOL. He writes: “For […]

14. Never mind the quality. Feel the width! More notes on thinking like a VC « excapite - December 8, 2009

[…] More on building an online media company to $50 Million […]

15. Lee Taylor - December 20, 2010

Is there any chance of a 2011 forecast on this topic?
I’m particularly interested in seeing if the revenue generated per subscriber has changed post crises


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: